ConservativeNerds
Politics • Science & Tech • Culture
The entire leaked Red Hat "Allyship Kickoff" Presentation. Unedited & Uncensored.
Presented exactly as leaked to The Lunduke Journal
December 16, 2023
post photo preview

On December 13th, an internal, Red Hat Powerpoint presentation was leaked to The Lunduke Journal by a confidential source.  That presentation, entitled "Allyship Kick-Off", contained some extremely racist (and extremely concerning) content -- as originally reported by The Lunduke Journal.  (If you are looking for some of the key points, read that original article.)

The fact that Red Hat (a subsidiary of IBM and the largest Linux company in the world) would produce and support the kind of statements found within this presentation was troubling, to say the least.

A few days later, on December 15th, some details of that presentation were also covered by James O'Keefe (and OMG) -- helping to continue bringing some much needed attention to this critical topic.

In the interest of full transparency -- and because the contents of this Red Hat presentation are so outlandish, racist, and cult-like -- The Lunduke Journal is publishing the entire contents below.  Quite frankly, it must be seen to be believed.

Every slide is presented without any edits or watermarks of any kind.  Beneath each slide we are including the full, completely unedited text of the Speaker Notes included within the Powerpoint presentation.  Exactly as originally leaked to The Lunduke Journal.

Note: A huge thank you to the subscribers to The Lunduke Journal for supporting truly independent, ad-free, Big-Tech-free Tech Journalism.  Couldn't do this without you.  And thank you to the brave whistleblower who provided this Presentation to The Lunduke Journal.

 


 

Slide 1

CLARENCE: Welcome message to everyone + disclaimer (this is completely voluntary, no judgement if you choose not to participate, this journey is unique to everyone and we welcome you to B.U.I.L.D. regardless)

 

Slide 2

 

Slide 3

ANNE:
Good afternoon everyone! For those of you who don’t know me, I’m Anne Moorer, and I’ve been at Red Hat for 5 years now currently working in the IT org. I appreciate the opportunity to come and share this presentation with you today and I thank the leadership team for their support, faith, and trust in this role. Without further ado, here’s the agenda we’ll cover in this kickoff and what to expect. While you’re reading through it on your own, I want to reiterate that our time together will really focus on laying a foundation for what allyship is and looks like, and not so much the definite ways in which we will execute on it. In order to for us to draft a clear plan, we need to know how many people are truly committed to this work. I don’t know most of you and vice versa, so I have no way of knowing today where each of you are on your own journey in this, so for the purposes of this presentation, we’re going to start with the basics first. It if aligns to what you are willing to do, great, and we’ll proceed from there. 

 

Slide 4

 

Slide 5

A note on scope. We need to make it clear that we are only a small part of BUILD and that we serve BUILD, in everything we do. We support, we are not separate. 

 

Slide 6

 

Slide 7

Words are important, especially in this context, so we first want to ground ourselves in the chosen definition of what allyship is and what it is not. This is a critical part of this presentation because we all have to commit to how allyship is defined before we even think about how we develop a plan around what it looks like for participants at Red Hat. A special thanks to Boo Boo Howse for sourcing and sharing this formal definition with us, taken directly from the Anti-Oppression Network’s website. (Read Definition). In closing, we must acknowledge that allyship is a journey and it is unique to everyone who embarks on it. But, that said, there is no arrival date and time for becoming an ally. It is truly a lifelong endeavor and a lifestyle choice, both at work and at home once you truly commit.

 

Slide 8

Our goals for allyship at Red Hat are listed here. (Read List). Again, these are goals we drafted with the lens of allyship as a program of work, so to speak. But on the next slide, we’ll address goals of allyship at a more personal level.

 

Slide 9

At the individual level, your allyship should (read list). This work is deeply personal by nature, so it’s important to think about your individual strengths, talents, and gifts that you can bring to the table. This way, you more readily ensure that your commitment stays true and that you continue to have good energy that can be sustained behind this work. Find a lane, or a few of them, and stay in it for the long haul.

One of the reasons why I love working at Red Hat is due to its people. I think we hire and retain some of the brightest most intelligent folks I’ve ever had the pleasure to work with. That said, it’s always been fulfilling to be around so many people who share the same commitment to excellence as I do, and sometimes that means that we aim for 100% on whatever “test” is ahead of us. But that kind of mentality will only lead to trouble here in this journey. Allyship is inherently messy and mistakes will be made if you are living into it correctly. So, it’s best to truly surrender your ego and any perfectionistic tendencies you bring to your everyday work life, because as Brene Brown so eloquently said, “I’m not here to be right, I’m here to get it right”. I strongly advise that you adopt that perspective before chosing to participate. 

If there’s one thing to take away from this introduction to allyship, it is the power of listening first. White people have had a long indoctrination in their history that has led them to believe that they are the ones to accurately analyze, problem solve, and articulate solutions over any other group. But, in allyship, this role is reversed. This work is about listening first, second, and third, before ever speaking. It is about observing and reflecting, unto yourself. It is about granting free and safe spaces to those we are fiighting for and in service to. We must recognize when we are in a black space, and treat that space as we would if we were a guest in someone’s home. White people most certainly do not have the answers in allyship. We are participating in this work to learn from the stories and experiences of our Black and Brown friends and colleagues so that we can take the actions for change that THEY tells us to do.  This work will never be about YOU. 

 

Slide 10

A special note on what allyship is NOT. We have to make it crystal clear that allyship is not the area in which the “Woke Olympics” are played out. This truly where this work fails before it even begins. Too many white people learn about allyship as a checklist of things to DO as opposed to an internal process that requires personal reflection and vigilance. This is not about competing with each other for who’s doing the right work the best way, or who’s doing the most work, or whatever other measuring stick you want to use to compare yourself to others. The only metric of success is our collective impact on levers of systemic racism, however those changes come about. 

That said, here’s how allyship can show up in all the wrong ways if we are not careful in our approach and understanding.  

Sources: 
https://guidetoallyship.com/
https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/10/counterproductive-allyship/

 

Slide 11

 

Slide 12

 

Slide 13

 

Slide 14

 

Slide 15

BEFORE YOU SIGN UP, CONSIDER THIS YOUR CHECKLIST CRITERIA.

  1. We won’t debate this.
  2. Google racial gaslighting. We’ll be spending a lot of time here. It happens everywhere, everyday, and it’s digging a deeper and deeper trench out of which Black people have to fight to get out of in their mental health. Just because you have not experienced a particular type of trauma in your life, does not mean that it does not exist or that its impact must be proven to you.
  3. Race is the greatest lie that was ever told, period. It is a myth. It was created by humans to oppress other humans. ALL sides of politics have played into this idea. We will not entertain a fight over which party did Black people worse, but will examine law and policy as it relates to how systemic racism is perpetuated today.
  4. We started it. We have to end it.
  5. Again, reverse racism does not exist and we have all the power.
  6. Just because you show up as an ally does not mean that you get a pass when you make a mistake. Any Black person, at any time, can hold you accountable however they see fit in that moment and you understand that their grace is out of your control. Do not expect ANYTHING for showing up. Again, this is our problem, and our only obligation is to learn and get back up again, not appeal for absolution.
  7. This can take many forms and depends on too many factors to name, but the key word here is MISTAKES. If you are truly leaning into this work, you will learn the hard way most of the time. But never lose sight of the fact that a race conversation that goes horribly wrong will ALWAYS be safer and less consequential for YOU as a white person than it will EVER be for the Black person holding you accountable, so keep your tears and hurt feelings to yourself in that moment and find another white person to help you through it.
  8. Let’s spend some time on this one. This is another term that you need to Google ASAP before deciding to opt in. White saviorism holds the idea that first and foremost, Black people are victims in need of white people to come to their aid and help them. LIES. Black people have been victimized, but they are not infantile as a result. Remember that Black people are PEOPLE rightfully demanding the delivery of the very same fundamental inalienable rights and you and I prosper from as white people. They are, as a population, INHERENTLY equal by virtue of their very humanity alone. Allyship seeks to dismantle the white systems that pull racist levers against Black people so that they can be honored fully as human beings, as they are. Don’t get it twisted.
  9. Here’s where this work gets tricky. We run the risk of coming into this work wanting the rule book for how to be the best support possible for this cause, and that simply doesn’t exist. We’re talking about addressing and solving for the most complex topic in the history of the world because it is a HUMAN one. Even among Black anti-racist educators and D+I experts, there are differing opinions and perspectives. Our job is not to seek the RIGHT one, but to learn all we can and proceed day by day with whatever we’re presented with in this work and do our level best with what we have and where we are. Please remember that a Black group of individuals is NO different than a white group of individuals in their humanity and range. HONOR THAT and don’t seek a manual that isn’t there. It’s like parenting - it doesn’t come with instructions. There are plenty of resources but NO instructions. Know the difference?
  10. I cannot stress this point enough and will continue to say it. Think about how icky is sounds to be a part of the race that started and continues to uphold systems of violence, destruction, and murder, AND ask for a reward each and every time you do ANYTHING to help. This is not about YOU. This work is about Black liberation. Do not measure your own actions in quantity or quantity. The measuring stick we should ALL be focusing on is the collective impact made upon the systems of oppression. PERIOD. 

 

Slide 16

This is the time in my presentation where I want to pause for a second and set the tone for the next few slides. We’ve learned about what allyship is and how it’s defined, as well as its core behaviors. But in truth, allyship and its success is predicated on real work. And it’s critical to understand the foundation of what this work is really about. Allyship is based on internal work, first and foremost. External actions come second. It doesn’t mean that you can’t take action when called to do so - in fact, please do, whenever possible. But, the point is that without first understanding where YOU are coming from, and assessing what you currently understand about how systemic racism came to be and how it operates, we end up spinning our wheels and progress is slow to achieve. So these next slides are critical to jump starting your education and understanding the mindshift required for how to take part in allyship appropriately from the beginning. Ok? 

 

Slide 17

We’re going to spend a lot of time here on WHITENESS. Far too often in this conversation, we talk about the Black experience and focus on Black people first. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, of course. BUT, in order to truly affect change, we have to first come to grips with OUR whiteness, as members of the white race, and the weight of what that carries within us. I want you to think about whiteness as a sociological construct, because systemic racism was birthed directly from it and is fed by it, all day, every day. Now, at this point, I want to make something very clear. This slide represents quite a wide range of resources that I have been consuming across multiple platforms from multiple authors and for the purposes of this presentation today, I wanted to try and distill key themes into a very simplistic, hyper-reduced model for you all on purpose. There is so much to talk about here, and innumerable nuances to go into, so this does not represent and end-all be all depiction. I will absolutely be sharing my citation list of sources with you all, I just couldn’t put them here all on one slide and still get the intended message across. But please know that none of this comes from my own head. There experts in this space who have been talking about whiteness for decades, so we know it’s a credible concept. Ok? So, that said, let’s dig into the first part of how whiteness operates: POWER.

Power: it’s our thing. We are the oppressors because we feed and thrive on power at the expense of other races. In fact, if power doesn’t come to us through the inherent domination of other races, it’s not real power. 
Kimberly Latrice Jones - monopoly

And because we made the rules based on how we hoard power, we have divided people by race through privileges for white people, and violence and oppression for everyone else. The thing to realize here is that because white is the default, it never has to be named. We hear about Black churches, associations for Black members, right? But try naming a white space the same way. You really don’t even think to do it because it’s off the table. Why would you bother? How and why would that ever be relevant? And this is a key origin of the violence inherent in whiteness. Because when it creates the privilege of being unnamed, all other spaces divided by race are automatically “othered”. And these spaces, in turn, only talk to themselves for the most part, because with white othering comes white violence to keep those other races “in line” and unthreatening to the power of whiteness. Stereotypes are created and marketed so that white people feel safe in our judgements and the violent actions we take against these groups. So white people become accustomed to seeing other races through a white gaze and white lens, evaluating them based on white cultural norms and measuring them in proximity to whiteness. In other words, the other races are dehumanized at worst, and pre-judged at best. So, the divide by race occurs and these groups focus inward because in this context, safe integration simply isn’t possible. We are very segregated by race and that is on purpose, no matter what you were taught about Brown V Board of Education.  Check your social. Data shows white listens to white, black listens to black. Now that’s not to say that these groups don’t mix at all, right? I mean, here we are right now - we work together and many of us do have Black friends or family, right? But, whiteness prevents white people from seeing and understanding and CARING about the fact that when there is a Black or a Brown person that enters our sphere, we rarely think about how that person may be twisting themselves into knots around us in conversations because they have been forced to NAVIGATE whiteness with extreme penalty for getting lost, or mistepping. And that is the foundation of the next phase, which is blindness.

If we are only talking to each other, and remain segregated, white people get the privilege of blindness. We don’t have to navigate what was built for us, and we don’t have to think about the fact that the game is rigged, because this is our status quo. And because whiteness doesn’t let on to us that we have a choice about staying in this white bubble, we don’t know what we don’t know, and we don’t question anything about our world view or experiences as they relate to race. White is right, again by default. You’ve heard that racism and hate is taught, and this is absolutely correct, but how? It’s taught through outright lies passed down through white generations, certainly, but the omissions of the truth are just as powerful. It’s what we leave out of our textbooks in school. It’s what we don’t read or see reflected in the news. So we don’t know that we are consuming our own white story, over and over again, and being put into spaces and context where it’s constantly reinforced without question. And because of this indoctrination and blindness, and the IGNORANCE we internalize because of it, we go right along perpetuating this system of power and oppression because that is what we’ve always done and no one that whiteness deems worthy of our attention is compelling us to stop. WE HAVE TO STOP IT. White people created race to breed racism and we are responsible for dismantling it by first owning our own ignorance and surrendering our baseless supremacy.

Sources for slides 17-21: 
https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_bias_of_professionalism_standards#
https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race/topics/whiteness
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culturally-speaking/202006/what-is-whiteness
https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/summer-2016/why-talk-about-whiteness
https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/politics/a25747603/silencing-black-voices/
http://www.mpassociates.us/uploads/3/7/1/0/37103967/sec_4_ch_11.pdf
https://nationalseedproject.org/Key-SEED-Texts/white-privilege-unpacking-the-invisible-knapsack
https://othersociologist.com/sociology-of-race/#whiteness
https://www.racialequitytools.org/resourcefiles/power_privilege.pdf
https://www.cwu.edu/diversity/sites/cts.cwu.edu.diversity/files/documents/constructingwhiteness.pdf
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3577&context=penn_law_review
https://medium.com/@amcarter/a-brief-history-of-whiteness-8d12e2ae0b25
http://fourteeneastmag.com/index.php/2020/02/21/11505/
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/31/black-writers-courageously-staring-down-the-white-gaze-this-is-why-we-all-must-read-them
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/toni-morrison-free-white-gaze/595675/
https://blogs.umass.edu/afroam391g-shabazz/files/2010/01/George-Yancy-on-Whiteness-as-Ambush.pdf
https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=mjrl
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/black-to-the-future-part-ii/unchained--but-unchanged--in-need-of-a-revolution/
https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1770&context=etd

Additional content extracted from the following social media accounts and their posts:
@accordingtoweeze
@sincerely.lettie
@ckyourprivilege
@privtoprog
@blavity
@context.project
@thezinnproject
@chnge
@impact
@everydayracism
@sharethemicnow
@blackculturenews_
@blacksuccesstoday
@blackdollarnetwork
@soyouwanttotalkabout
@whydontwediscuss
@blacktwttr
@rolandsmartin
@theblkdaily
@voltedvoice
@thejournalista
@proudnastywomen
@keishadelvacreative
@rachel.cargle
@austinchanning

 

Slide 18

Let’s take this a step further. I love this analogy that I heard from an IG live session I attended by Privilege to Progress, which I strongly encourage you to follow. They presented this idea of a microscope to help visualize the ways white people have been taught to view the world. Whiteness knows that if it puts every single aspect of another race “under the microscope”, and constantly focuses white attention on what’s WRONG with that race, without ever naming whiteness as the measuring stick, it will keep itself fed. So, what’s been under the microscope historically? Well, we’ve successfully created numerous stereotypes out of “Black behaviors”, right? We start with the premise that Black people are more dangerous and violent than any other group, and we make sure that campaign sticks enough so that when they start protesting racism in the streets or even just becoming angry at you in a conversation, we can say, “Well, there’s the proof! It must be true!”.  We distort Black culture and its representations to ensure that we believe it to be uncivilized, unsophisticated, barbaric even. White people cherry pick the parts of Black history that are agreeable to THEM and ALLOW those facts to be taught in schools, but only during February, please. Black oppression focuses on victim blaming - how do they deserve to be where they are or have been. We reframe Black celebrity to congratulate ourselves anytime the reality our own racism gets a little too close for comfort, like Jackie Robinson, the baseball player who “Broke the Color Barrier”. This is a classic white supremacist headline because he didn’t break through anything, white people in power decided he could play that day so that they could show “progress” in a way that still kept them large and in charge. The game is rigged, remember? The list goes on for each of these things and there are too many examples to cite for each, and this is certainly not an exhaustive list. BUT, we can’t linger here. Because they real work of allyship is to address the real problem that is whiteness and how it has successfully convinced us that it’s everyone else who’s coming up short, and therefore this struggle of racism is theirs to solve, not ours. So this list is the real problem allyship seeks to address first. How do we name and claim whiteness in all its forms aligned to how we’ve been told to think about Black people. We have to be honest that our microscope lens is WHITE and opaque. We’re not seeing truth. We’re seeing what serves us. We’re seeing what keeps us in power and keeps us free from accountability in the violence we execute through this lens. 

 

Slide 19

A note about what gets missed on purpose when we examine things through a white lens AND continue to segregate ourselves. I have challenge for you all here today, and I can tell you firsthand that it has made a profound impact on my life as a white person looking to do better in this work. 8 weeks ago, I was scrolling through Instagram. This was after I had started following many Black and Brown anti-racist educators in my feed. I came across a post that was very simple and it gave me a lot to consider in a single moment. It said: White people. Check your list of people and accounts that you follow on Instagram. Go through it and remove anything that doesn’t give you true joy or provide education. Now, check to see how many of those people and accounts are WHITE. If your instagram feed isn’t 50% Black, you’re doing it wrong. Take the challenge.

I took the challenge. And I started researching the Black people and accounts I could follow based on my interests, hobbies, industry, you name it. And within the span of a day, my feed was 50% Black. And it still is today. And it will likely continue to be so, because through this change I have been nothing short of amazed at the extent of white erasure. White erasure directly supports our white blindness. It keeps us ignorant of what whiteness doesn’t want us to see. Whiteness loses power when we humanize those we oppress. Heaven forbid we should recognize anything that’s going WELL in the Black population. And even when whiteness chooses to do so (like Jackie Robinson’s example, because that never really went away) you would think that this was the FIRST time a Black person ever really achieved anything at all. You think that Black person must be a unicorn. But the reality is that Black Excellence has been the true foundation of our human history (as this graphic speaks to, clearly). Black Excellence has been normalized as a rarity and not the norm itself. So, throughout time, whiteness has systematically erased or kept hidden from view, the list on the left, so that it can ensure we are shocked and surprised when a Black person receives an accolade, let alone “speaks well”.

Fun fact #2: Beethoven was Black.Fun fact #3: The SAT was created by a eugenicist named Carl Brigham, who firmly believed that such a test would reveal the natural intellectual ability of white people. These are the things allyship requires us to learn about and understand, and then see their impacts as violent and trauma-inducing. And we have to look inside ourselves to see where our learned biases and racist ideas have prevented us from asking the right questions or self educating to know the real truth about our world. 

 

Slide 20

So, what SHOULD be under the microscope? Whiteness. All day, every day, until we can truly name and claim its every impact and appearance within the context of systemic racism. And the reason we have to do this first, is because of these numbers. White creates the game, then rigs it. Because it can. Because it dominates and oppresses. And we have to be hyper aware of the ways whiteness will protect itself and those that believe in its power, at every turn. Because if you are doing allyship correctly, whiteness should start to turn on YOU. You should expect to feel it stab you eventually. Maybe you lose friends. Maybe you miss out on a promotion because you did the right thing. Allyship takes true risk and sacrifice to do, and it requires your vigilance regardless of these consequences. After all, our Black friends and colleagues have navigated whiteness long enough to tell you that its brutality never stops as long as it reigns. But whiteness’s greatest lie is in telling you, a white person, that this is journey is too hard. It’s actively banking on your fragility to force you into giving up and coming back over to the other side again. It will scream at you to be terrified of living into the work of allyship but it will give you a false reason why. It will convince you to be afraid of saying or doing the wrong thing in front of a Black person because of the consequences you will suffer. It will convince you that the real fear lies there, in the anger and trauma of a Black person. When really, NO race conversation that you will ever have as a white person will carry nearly the risk and extreme consequences for you as it does a Black person. They are the ones that suffer in a race conversation gone wrong, not you. Whiteness will misplace your fear. Your real fear should be how whiteness will turn on YOU when you choose the side of the oppressed over your white race. And that is what we have to prepare for and support each other for in allyship. 

 

Slide 21

So in summary, the path is to address what’s on the inside first. Understand our whiteness and how it operates, and see where we have been complicit or complacent within it. Address the biases we’ve internalized through our own indoctrination, and reframe our perspective. Acknowledge that we never got the whole or true story. And then, and only then, can we start to trade out the white lens we’ve been using in our microscope for a clear one, one that doesn’t distort the things we’ve been taught to believe or think about Black people, and internalize what’s true for once, learning from THEM directly, we can force their humanization with other white people. We can arm ourselves with the facts and knowledge to champion what whiteness erased in its anti-Black agenda, and change the narrative around us. All while tackling the systems in place that uphold the status quo.

 

Slide 22

 

Slide 23

ALLYSHIP PITFALL
Successful allyship requires a thoughtful understanding of key psychological consequences of engaging in this work. This is directly related to the fact that allies are (usually) in the white majority. 

White people who are committed to allyship will inevitably undergo a process known as Racial Identity Development. The more they learn, act, and engage in the work, the further they progress along a continuum of emotions and growth. 

Allyship is EMOTIONAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL.

Each stage, especially in the beginning, can lead the aspiring ally to potentially cause harm and discomfort to the very people they intend to serve. 

We will educate the B.U.I.L.D. community (both Black and ally members) about this process and its continuum, focusing on the behaviors that may appear and how best to address them in advance.

 

Slide 24

 

Slide 25

 

Slide 26

 

Slide 27

 

Slide 28

 

Slide 29

 

community logo
Join the ConservativeNerds Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
10
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 11, 2023
"The Ben Heckendorn Interview" - Conservative Nerds Podcast - Sep 11, 2023

Today I had the chance to talk with one of the coolest nerds on this green Earth of ours: Ben Heckendorn (aka the "Ben Heck" part of "The Ben Heck Show" ).

We've watched Ben turn XBox's, Atari 800's, and Apple IIgs's into handhelds and laptops. We've seen him build amazing Pinball machines. This nerd is legit.

But today we're talking to Ben almost entirely about political stuff -- he is one of the rare nerd voices that have been actively speaking out against some of the craziness in the world (such as Covid insanity).

Ben's website: https://www.benheck.com/

"The Ben Heckendorn Interview" - Conservative Nerds Podcast - Sep 11, 2023
Where can Conservative voices publish without censorship?

The Lunduke Journal of Conservative Nerdiness Podcast - April 27, 2023

The Big Tech platforms (like Twitter and YouTube) have a long, well documented history of silencing Conservative ideas and Conservative people. So where, in 2023, can a Conservative writer, podcaster, or video producer publish their ideas without fear of constant censorship… and while still reaching a sizable audience?

Rumble? Locals? Substack? Twitter? I have some thoughts.

Where can Conservative voices publish without censorship?
The logical contradictions of the Trans concept

The Lunduke Journal of Conservative Nerdiness - April 18, 2023

There are some pretty significant logical problems with the Transgender concept… movement… religion… whatever you’d like to call it. Logical problems — and extreme contradictions — in both the idea itself and the way it is being advocated for.

I’d like to spend a few moments calling out just a few of those logic problems and contradictions.

The logical contradictions of the Trans concept

And there it is. The complete electoral map (via 270towin.com):

post photo preview
10 hours ago

Last one

post photo preview

Okay, because I saw the question asked three times, I'm going to address it, namely: "Where did the 20 million Democrat voters go??"

Answer: They were partly eliminated from voter rolls, because dead or moved; partly absent because there were not the same fraudulent ballots able to be cast again; partly eliminated because more places barred illegal aliens from voting, than allowed them; and a few voted Republican.

post photo preview
Red Hat vs Hyprland: Silencing political "undesirables"
Beneath the drama: The abuse of corporate power, extremist politics, bullying, & censorship of "wrongthink".

The Open Source world is no stranger to drama.  Heck, if it's a day that ends in "Ay!", there's likely some random, usually overblown, drama happening in one Open Source organization or another.

But, sometimes, within that drama, there exists a bigger story.

Such is the case with "Red Hat vs Hyprland".

Within this drama there lies a tale of extremist poltiics, abuse of corporate power, and silencing of political "undesirables".  The things we learn here -- burried beneath the layers of drama -- are deeply disturbing, with significant ramifications for the entire Open Source industry.

Cutting through the noise

As with all drama, there's a lot of finger pointing.  And... noise.  So much noise.  Let's cut through all of that and get right to the facts.

The basic facts of this event:

  1. The core developer behind Hyprland (a tiling Linux window manager which has gained significant traction), a man who goes by the name "Vaxry", has been banned from any involvement in the Freedesktop project (an umbrella project covering Xorg, Wayland, and many other core Linux Desktop projects).
  2. This ban means that Vaxry will not be allowed to report bugs or submit code patches to Freedesktop projects -- often directly relevant to his own work on the Hyprland window manager.
  3. The ban (affecting Freedesktop) was enacted by a Red Hat representative (using a RedHat.com email address), based on a perceived 2 year old "Code of Conduct Violation" on a Hyprland chat server.
  4. Red Hat, Freedesktop, and Hyprland are all separate organizations.

As with any drama, there's a great deal of other information out there -- along with frenzied onlookers yelling about it from the sidelines -- but those are the core actions and facts.

The key takeaway: A representative from Red Hat was using corporate power to force a person out of other (read: non-Red Hat) organizations.  For reasons not related to Red Hat.  Nor related to the organization the person was being banned from.

In essence, Red Hat flexing it's muscle -- bending large portions of the Open Source world to do it's bidding.

By itself, that's bad enough.  But it gets worse.  Much worse.

What was the "violation"?

In order to understand how truly disturbing this issue is, we need to know a few additional details.  Starting with the initial "Code of Conduct Violation".

Back in 2022 -- yes, two years ago -- on the Discord chat server for the Hyprland window manager project, a man who identified as "Trans" listed his preferred prouns as "she/her".

A moderator on that Hyprland chat server changed that "Trans" person's pronouns to list as "who/cares".

Screenshot of the "Code of Conduct Violation".

Flash forward to 2024, and this "who/cares" action comes to the attention of another man who identifies as "Trans".  An employee of Red Hat named Lyude Paul.

To give you an idea of the motivations of the actions which follow: Lyude Paul has a publicly stated goal of "bullying" anyone who does not adequately show respect to "Trans" issues, as shown in his social media posts.

Source: Lyude Paul's Mastodon account.

Lyude Paul also promotes the idea that "right-wing people are not welcomed" in organizations.

Source: Lyude Paul's Mastodon account.

As Lyude Paul has a stated objective of "bullying" people -- making sure they are "not welcomed" -- if they do not profess the correct political ideals (or do not support "Trans" activism in the proper way)... it is not entirely surprising that this gentleman would use his position at Red Hat to ban those he disagrees with.

And that is exactly what happened.

Source: Lyude Paul's official email from RedHat.com.

Lyude Paul -- using his Red Hat email address -- informed Vaxry (the lead developer of Hyprland -- the project where the "who/cares" chat server incident occurred) that he was now banned from the entirety of the Freedesktop project and organization.

An important note: When a person sends an email from their corporate email account, they are acting on behalf of the corporation.  That is a hard and fast rule that has been in place since... well... forever.  Likewise Red Hat has not distanced itself from these actions in the least.

You can read the full emails, from Lyude Paul / Red Hat, as published by Vaxry.

The Red Hat Problem

This is an example of Red Hat, a corporation with a wild history of discrimination and censorship, using their corporate power (and strength within the Linux and Open Source world) to bully and silence those they politically disagree with.

Red Hat could condemn these actions (which were done in Red Hat's name) by their employee.  They have not done so.

None of this should be terribly surprising, considering what we already know about the IBM subsidiary.  They have a history of taking extreme political stances... and they actively discriminate against employees who deviate from their allowed, always extremely politically Leftist, ideals.

Considering Red Hat's historical stances and actions, it is no surprise that an employee of Red Hat would be able to use the corporate power of Red Hat to bully others who possessed the wrong ideas (as was the publicly stated objective of Lyude Paul).

A singular bit of drama... and a trend.

This particular incident has elicited strong reactions -- and has grabbed the attention of many across the Linux and Open Source industry.  Lots of drama.  Lots of opportunities to quote people who are making big, outlandish statements.

And most of that drama is little more than distracting fluff.

But the core -- the facts -- are truly disturbing.  And, once again, Red Hat finds itself at the center of another story where people are being discriminated against.

A few closing thoughts.

  • If this sort of bullying, censorship, and blacklisting of those with the "wrong politics" is allowed to continue... it will get worse.
  • Lyude Paul is guilty of far more extreme "Code of Conduct" violations than Vaxry -- as is shown in the screenshots above.  Yet Lyude Paul has not been banned, censored, or punished in any way by Red Hat or Freedesktop.
  • It would appear fairly obvious that the "Code of Conduct", at least in this case, is being used as a weapon to selectively harm specific individuals.
  • Considering Red Hat / IBM's history and dedication to discriminating against specific groups, it seems a fair assumption that these actions are not only allowed but encouraged by corporate leadership.  Should that not be the case, The Lunduke Journal encourages Red Hat and IBM to make a statement regarding it.  If such a statement is made, The Lunduke Journal will publish it in full.
  • Will Open Source organizations -- such as Freedesktop -- allow these sorts of discriminatory actions to continue?
  • Should Freedesktop, and others, continue allowing this type of discrimination... what result will that have on existing Open Source projects and users of those projects?

The Lunduke Journal has reached out to representatives from IBM and Red Hat for comment.  As of the time of publication The Lunduke Journal has received no response.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Crazy Tech People Who Hate Lunduke - Part I
Lunduke drives Tech Journalists to mADnEsS & destroys entire projects... with his magic words!

One of my super-powers (apparently) is writing words which burrow into the brains of many nerds... driving them slowly insane.

Tech Journalists, Software Developers, Project Managers... even your average computer nerds are susceptible to my wizardly words of wickedness.

And, because I have to see their linguistic detritus, I am now going to subject all of you to the insanity which they spew.

I present to you: "Crazy Tech People Who Hate Lunduke - Part I"

Yeah.  Part One.

Fair Warning: I've censored some of the more offensive words in the following screenshots.  But, just the same, their declarations aren't exactly clean and wholesome.

OSNews.com

We begin with Thom Holwerda, the editor of OSNews.com.  He recently posted this delightful gem over on Mastodon (a social network filled with people who are definitely very well adjusted *wink wink*).

Oh, dear.

"Hey Lunduke," I hear you asking.  "Could you provide us a single screenshot that gives us a glimpse into the minds of the average Leftist Tech Journalist?"

Ta-da.

Curious why certain "Tech News" sites refuse to cover Lunduke Journal articles (no matter how massive the news)?  I think this helps to explain it.  This is how they see people.

Also... nEaT caPITaLizATioN, DudE!

GLIMPSE (a GIMP fork)

The creator of GLIMPSE (a fork of GIMP) recently published this regarding my coverage of Mozilla and Firefox.

I am so powerful.

I'm going to go ahead and quote that.  Because it's awesome.

"If you're angry at Mozilla because Bryan Lunduke said mean things about them, then as someone whose previous project was torn apart after one of his videos called it a "woke fork", I kindly invite you to go [CENSORED] yourself."

Apparently I, Bryan Lunduke, single handedly "tore apart" an entire project (the GLIMPSE project, I assume) by simply mentioning it.

I'm going to be honest with you... I had completely forgotten that project existed.  But, according to the project founder, I "tore it apart" with my word magic.

Not gonna lie.  Feeling pretty powerful right now.

Wonder which project I should mention next...

elementary OS

Here is a -- definitely very sane and reasonable -- post from the founder (and currently sole employee) of elementary OS (a fork of Ubuntu).  That post is entitled "Assault, death, transphobia, etc".

Wait.  What did I do?

I'm not 100% sure... but I think he's saying I... took out a hit on him?  Like... in a mafia movie?  By... posting an article about computers?  And if someone else shares the link to that article... that person is now part of... that hit?  Or something?

Or maybe my words are like that VHS tape in The Ring?  You know... you read a few of my words then a creeply lady starts crawling around your laptop before you die?

Huh!

Well.  Either way.  You heard it here first, folks.  Sharing links to my words is, like, literally murder.  The future is weird!

Rent free, baby!

What have we learned today?

  • My words drive Tech Journalists to mADnEsS.
  • I can "tear apart" open source projects with two words.
  • If you share a link to my words, you are comitting murder.

One thing is also clear: They can't stop talking about me... my wizard words compel them.

In fact, it's gotten to the point where people are issuing "Stop reposting Bryan Lunduke Challenges".

Good luck, buddy.

If past performance is any indication of future performance... that challenge will end poorly.  Especially after I write up some more of my Black Magic Words of Wonder.

Whew!

Wonder what we'll learn in Part II?

Read full Article
post photo preview
43% of Left-wing nerds support the ban of opposing political ideas
New poll shows nearly half of Left-wing IT professionals favor heavy censorship of social media and all online publishing.

Censorship of online discourse is a major point of disagreement between the political Left and Right.

Tech organizations perceived as "Politically Left-leaning", tend to support the banning of ideas from Online publishing platforms (Social Media, YouTube, Forums, etc.) -- Mozilla's infamous declaration of "we need more than deplatforming" being one such example.

On the flipside, most moves towards less censorship are regarded as being "Politically Right-leaning" -- a great example being Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter, and subsequent loosening of some censorship rules on the X / Twitter platform.

But -- among those in the Tech Industry -- what are the true numbers of those who support the censorship of ideas?

What percentage of those on the Left, Center, and Right (politically) actually support the complete banning of certain ideas from online publishing?

The Lunduke Journal asked 7,200 people in the Tech Industry for their opinions on the topic.  These respondents represented a wide range of technical, political, and demographic backgrounds.

Here are the results.

What percentage of those, from each political leaning, supported the banning of at least one idea from online publishing.

43.8% of all Tech Industry respondents, who identified as "Left-Leaning" politically, said they supported the total banning of at least one idea from all online publishing platforms.

Compare that with 19.5% for political "Centrists" and 8.2% for those who said they were "Right-Leaning".

The exact question, asked in the survey, is as follows:

"Which of the following ideas should be censored or banned from Social Media, Community Forums, YouTube, or other public publishing platforms?

 

Note: Not ideas which you agree or disagree with.  Only those which should not be allowed.

 

Check all ideas which should not be allowed on public platforms."

The 6 following options were presented:

  • The 2020 election was stolen from Trump.
  • The 2016 election was stolen from Clinton.
  • The COVID vaccines are potentially dangerous.
  • Climate Change is not a real threat.
  • There are only two genders (male and female).
  • January 6th was a dangerous insurrection.

Six ideas, from different ends of the political spectrum (and touching on different types of topics).

Here is the breakdown, by political leaning, for each idea:

That's a lot of blue.

The numbers speak for themselves, but a few quick takeaways:

  1. There appears to be no topic where a majority (over 50%), of any political leaning, supports full censorship.
  2. Just the same, a significant percentage (between 18% and 33%) of Left-leaning people advocated for a full banning of specific ideas and topics which disagreed with their core political messaging.
  3. Nearly half of all Left-Leaning people (43.8%) support the total banning of at least one concept from being discussed online.
  4. When the ideas agreed with Left-leaning political messaging -- such as "2016 election stolen from Clinton" or "Jan 6th was an insurrection" -- Left-leaning support for censorship dropped significantly (down as far as 3.3%).
  5. Right-leaning support for idea banning stayed very low (3% or lower) and consistent, regardless of the idea (including Left-wing political messaging).

In other words...

When an idea contradicts Left-wing talking points or values... a significant percentage of Leftists believe it should not be allowed to be discussed online.  By anyone.  It becomes a forbidden concept entirely.

People on the Right, by and large, do not wish to restrict the ideas of anyone.  Even when those ideas are ones which contradict Right-leaning talking points or values.


About The Great Tech Industry Demographics Survey

This report is derived from data obtained between February 22nd and March 10th of 2024, as part of the Great Tech Industry Demographics Survey.  During this survey, 7,200 respondents (a sample size many times larger than used by most polling agencies in national elections) answered 46 questions on a wide variety of technical, political, personal, and IT work-place related topics.

The survey was distributed by a wide range of writers, podcasters, YouTubers, & tech enthusiasts -- representing a variety of computing preferences (Windows vs Mac vs Linux, etc.) and political leanings.

The full, anonymous data will be released -- to allow for additional public analysis -- following a round of initial reporting by The Lunduke Journal.


If you are not already a subscriber to Conservative Nerds (part of The Lunduke Journal), now's a great time.  At the very least, get yourself a free subscription so you don't miss out.

Find more information (including RSS Podcast feeds, links to some of the big shows, how to become a whistleblower, how to gain access to other parts of The Lunduke Journal, and more) at the Lunduke Journal Link Central page.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals